EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001531_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Fri Oct 27 22:14:23 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA042927262; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 22:14:23 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from access1.digex.net by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA042857257; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 22:14:18 -0700
Received: (from erniew@localhost) by access1.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA15571 ; for ; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 01:07:22 -0400
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 01:07:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ernie Wright <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Bug Lists
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Joe Dunfee asked:

>    Do any of you all know of an actual example where a company's
> release of a bug list caused the company harm?

I tend to favor disclosure as a matter of principle, but it's not my
money to lose--do you know of an example where it did a company any
good?  Or where a company's even done it at all?

That's where the burden of proof lies.  I mean, there's no debate
about whether it would benefit *users*.

- Ernie

--
Ernie Wright <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]